Monday 3 October 2011

TED Mark Pagel - How language transformed our humanity

I'm going to answer the question "What do you think about the fact that there's a dilemma in our modern globalized world. Whether to keep our 7,000 or 8,000 different languages or make the world as one world with one language.'

Well, I think that has some negative and positive sides. When everyone is going to change their language in the same one, teachers which teach people foreign language, will lose their job. Everybody is going to be the 'same' , there is no challenge anymore to learn how to speak another language with which you can communicate to foreign people. On the other hand, it'll make it easier to trade with eachother. When people speak the same language, there will be less of a barrier to understand eachother. Plus the fact that, like Mark Pagel said during his speech, the European Union will have to spend less/no money on translating all the reports into 23 different languages. This will save them billions of dollars! The money used for the translations could be used for Greece right now (for example).  I'm not supporter of the idea to make one world with only one language. It's hard to let all people adapt the new language. Besides, I think different languages are pretty much interesting!

There will be people who think: "YEAH! This is an amazing idea!". How will you change the language of people who live in the bush bush? Mark Pagel's speech was quite interesting, I'm wondering how different people think about this dilemma.

Sunday 2 October 2011

From metaphors we live by

Lakoff and Johnson have written a book about metaphors. Below you will read a short summary about the first seven chapters.


Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature. Since metaphorical expressions in our language are tied to metaphorical concepts in a systematic way, we can use metaphorical linguistic expressions to study the nature of metaphorical concepts and to gain an understanding of the metaphorical nature of our activities.
A case of how a metaphorical concept can hide an aspect of our experience  can be seen in what Michael Reddy has called “conduit metaphor”.  The speaker puts ideas (objects) into words (containers) and sends them (along a conduit) to a hearer who takes the idea/objects out of the word/containers.
The linguistic expressions are containers for meanings aspect of the conduit metaphor entails that words and sentences have meanings in themselves, independent of any context or speaker. The meanings are objects part of the metaphor, entails that meanings have an existence independent of people and contexts. The part of the metaphor that says linguistic expressions are containers for meaning entails that words (and sentences) have meanings, again independent of context and speakers.
There are sentences that have no meaning without context, but there are cases where a single sentence will mean different things to different people.  The conduit metaphor does not fit cases where context is required to determine whether the sentence has many meanings at all and what meaning it has. 


Once we can identify our experiences as entities or substances, we can refer to them, categorize them , group them, and quantify them = REASON ABOUT THEM.
Ontological Metaphors are so natural, we don't notice them being a metaphor.



Different types of metaphors:
Structural Metaphors: one concept is metaphorically structured in terms of another concept
Oriental Metaphors: have to do with spatial orientation (happy is up, sad is down)
Ontological Metaphors: entity and substance metaphor (Inflation: view it as an entitiy, refer to it, quantify and identify it)
Container Metaphors:
Land Areas: moving out, into another - we set boundaries for physical things, we define where the forest stops, we define when we're in or out a room.

Visual Field: we describe what we can or can not see.
Events, Actions, Activities, and States: Events are often viewed as a container object, Activities as substances. Activities are viewed as containers for the actions and other activities that make them up.
Personification: on-human objects or concepts are given human traits or described as if they were human.
Good things are UP, bad things are DOWN, fundamental concepts contain more or one spatialization metaphors. It is hard to distinguish the physical from the cultural basis of a metaphor, since the choice of one physical basis from among many possible ones has to do with cultural coherence.
Many of our values cohere with the metaphorical structure. Which values get priority depends on culture, subculture and your personal values.